<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maintenance Updates, PhotoQ 1.6.3 and iQ2 1.0.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/</link>
	<description>serving fresh homemade photographs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoismanu</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/comment-page-1/#comment-14343</link>
		<dc:creator>whoismanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismanu.com/?p=777#comment-14343</guid>
		<description>amber,

i guess you are talking about photos that were already posted? if so, right now the way you edit information on an already posted photo depends on your settings. if you have the inline description checkbox checked (not true in your case if i interpret your comment correctly) you can change it it directly in the edit post screen. if you do not inline the description, you can only edit it in the photoQDescr custom field. so in your case if you update the custom field it should work.

i know this whole thing is suboptimal right now and that is exactly why this is the second item on my to do list. so this should get changed and made simpler in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amber,</p>
<p>i guess you are talking about photos that were already posted? if so, right now the way you edit information on an already posted photo depends on your settings. if you have the inline description checkbox checked (not true in your case if i interpret your comment correctly) you can change it it directly in the edit post screen. if you do not inline the description, you can only edit it in the photoQDescr custom field. so in your case if you update the custom field it should work.</p>
<p>i know this whole thing is suboptimal right now and that is exactly why this is the second item on my to do list. so this should get changed and made simpler in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/comment-page-1/#comment-14322</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismanu.com/?p=777#comment-14322</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am having a problem with the plugin. It does exactly what I want it to do (makes a thumbnail, resizes the main image, links the thumbnail to the main image with lightbox rel) but every time I type something under the image in the edit post screen, then hit save, the text I type disappears. I have tried typing in the excerpt too. Do you know why this is? It&#039;s very frustrating. THank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am having a problem with the plugin. It does exactly what I want it to do (makes a thumbnail, resizes the main image, links the thumbnail to the main image with lightbox rel) but every time I type something under the image in the edit post screen, then hit save, the text I type disappears. I have tried typing in the excerpt too. Do you know why this is? It&#8217;s very frustrating. THank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleidos</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/comment-page-1/#comment-14234</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleidos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismanu.com/?p=777#comment-14234</guid>
		<description>Thanks Manu!! i use Photoq since 1 mouth more or less and these plug-in anime me to make more Post and public more photos on my weblog. 

I cant say more becouse my english is very bad and write these are dificult to me 

Thanks another time :D 

See you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Manu!! i use Photoq since 1 mouth more or less and these plug-in anime me to make more Post and public more photos on my weblog. </p>
<p>I cant say more becouse my english is very bad and write these are dificult to me </p>
<p>Thanks another time :D </p>
<p>See you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoismanu</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/comment-page-1/#comment-14222</link>
		<dc:creator>whoismanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismanu.com/?p=777#comment-14222</guid>
		<description>tony,

well i wouldn&#039;t put it that way. yes they changed sth from 2.7 to 2.7.1. but the bug still was because of me programming sloppy. i just got lucky until 2.7.1. so if you need to yell at someone... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tony,</p>
<p>well i wouldn&#8217;t put it that way. yes they changed sth from 2.7 to 2.7.1. but the bug still was because of me programming sloppy. i just got lucky until 2.7.1. so if you need to yell at someone&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismanu.com/blog/2009/03/maintenance-updates-photoq-163-and-iq2-104/comment-page-1/#comment-14221</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismanu.com/?p=777#comment-14221</guid>
		<description>Thanks a bunch! Really appreciate the work you did. Now to yell at the Wordpress people for screwing things up from 2.7 to 2.7.1!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a bunch! Really appreciate the work you did. Now to yell at the WordPress people for screwing things up from 2.7 to 2.7.1!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

